Comments for Gurkan Nisanci's Weblog http://nisanci.wordpress.com Just another WordPress.com weblog Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:07:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Hello world again! by Gurkan Nisanci http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-world/#comment-7 Gurkan Nisanci Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:07:09 +0000 #comment-7 Yes, thanks again Jesus for it Yes, thanks again Jesus for it

]]> Comment on Hello world again! by Jesus Rodriguez http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2007/05/31/hello-world/#comment-6 Jesus Rodriguez Thu, 31 May 2007 13:53:18 +0000 #comment-6 I'm glad my post was helpful in getting you migrated from jroller to Wordpress. I’m glad my post was helpful in getting you migrated from jroller to WordPress.

]]> Comment on BuildMonitor-Watch CruiseControl from your Firefox status bar by GB http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/31/buildmonitor/#comment-2 GB Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:18:47 +0000 http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/31/buildmonitor/#comment-2 This definitely sounds like an interesting extension. Would you happen to know if one exists for monitoring Luntbuild? I can't seem to find any. This definitely sounds like an interesting extension. Would you happen to know if one exists for monitoring Luntbuild? I can’t seem to find any.

]]> Comment on Extracting to a method by serverdude http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-5 serverdude Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:31:42 +0000 http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-5 Well, it may be read more easily, but it performs a lot worse unless you have constant strings. The original version skips string building which is slow, unless the string is really needed because logging is enabled. Thus the original version is a har to read optimized version of the refactored version. Well, it may be read more easily, but it performs a lot worse unless you have constant strings.

The original version skips string building which is slow, unless the string is really needed because logging is enabled. Thus the original version is a har to read optimized version of the refactored version.

]]> Comment on Extracting to a method by Cimballi http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-4 Cimballi Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:23:59 +0000 http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-4 And what happens if you need to log at different levels ? You should at least propose the five methods logDebug, logInfo, logWarn, ... And what happens if you need to log at different levels ? You should at least propose the five methods logDebug, logInfo, logWarn, …

]]> Comment on Extracting to a method by Ruben http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-3 Ruben Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:46:33 +0000 http://nisanci.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/extracting_to_a_method/#comment-3 The point of checking for isDebugEnabled() is avoiding the building of the String object (if this is a complex one with a lof of appends). Adding a new method doesn't help (the String will be built anyway, so you don't win anything) The point of checking for isDebugEnabled() is avoiding the building of the String object (if this is a complex one with a lof of appends).

Adding a new method doesn’t help (the String will be built anyway, so you don’t win anything)

]]>